By Dan Pool, Editor
To say I’m outraged by the outrage might seem hypocritical. It’s more a case of I’m tired of seeing constant outrage as the go-to response for everything.
Every time our president makes an off-the-cuff remark, there is a flood of liberals who wail and moan and gnash their teeth as though the comment was going to destroy the country. Then comes the backlash of conservatives who wail and moan and gnash their teeth that the liberals got so heated up in the first place.
It would be much more impressive had someone posted on their social media, “I was looking over the latest reports on the effects of the tariffs and...”
Have a little substance instead of non-stop yelling and yakking about trivial matters as Shakespeare might say, “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”
The height of my outrage over this outrage involves actor Jussie Smollett, who became really famous and discussed as though he were an important person. Other than Empire, Smollett’s career has little of distinction unless the Mighty Ducks ranks as a classic, and outside of acting, he had nothing of any gravitas to suggest his opinions or actions should be the subject of study. The news story that brought him infamy is pretty humorous. In a nutshell he paid two guys to rough him up, then claimed it was a hate crime, hoping to boost his career. Chicago police saw through the farce. So no one got hurt other than the guy who paid people to do it.
But, judging by media reporting, you would think Smollett was a spokesperson for the modern liberal world, a figure whose actions need to be debated and parsed over in pleasant company or at least on social media.
Author Bret Easton Ellis used the phrase “generation wuss” to describe the faux outrage that erupts every time anyone says anything that doesn’t sit right with the masses.
He was targeting millennials whom he called overly-sensitive and narcissistic – because they were always upset by something and thought society gave a darn about their feelings. But from what I see this generation wuss outrage infects all levels of society.
Even here in Pickens County, as anyone has followed the news knows, a convicted sex offender was found roaming the halls and entering the bathroom at Tate Elementary. He was on campus including entering a bathroom about five minutes before being escorted to the office where his identification was copied. He left the building but when his prior convictions came to light, he was arrested before the sun went down.
He gained access through a door that apparently didn’t latch because pine bark got stuck in it. The sheriff has since added personnel to see that full-time officers are at all schools. The schools have elaborate plans to review procedures and entrances.
While the man’s motives aren’t known, this is certainly a concerning situation to everyone -- possibly a close call with tragedy. But at the core, the problem was a malfunctioning door, not a colossal sign of incompetence or moral laxity or an indication that people are blasé about sex offenders at elementary schools. It was ludicrous to see people make online comments to the effect they wouldn’t stand for sex offenders to be walking the halls of schools. As though what? Other people find sex offenders on an elementary campus acceptable? As though the school not only should have known the particular door was malfunctioning but also foreseen that a sex offender was going to walk through?
This shouldn’t be taken lightly but when you get to the bottom line unnoticed pine bark stuck in a door is not a grievous sin or an unpardonable mistake.
Most of the time in life it is simply a malfunctioning door, not a moral failing and jumping on a moral high-horse every single day will sooner or later break the poor animal’s back.